Hi,
is there a way by which we can provide rowlevel security in sql server2000.
If the above feature is not available can anyone tell me any Work around solutions
thanks
VyasDOn't think there's any built-in support for this.
Use a view?
Showing posts with label provide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label provide. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
rounding in sql
Can anyone provide any links or information about the differences in
rounding between access 97 and sql 2000.See
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...en-us%3B196652.
--Mary
On Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:28 -0500, "Ben Wallace \(3\)"
<kixman@.excite.com> wrote:
>Can anyone provide any links or information about the differences in
>rounding between access 97 and sql 2000.
>|||You might also like to know that truncation and rounding at
implementation defined in Standard SQL.|||> You might also like to know that truncation and rounding are
> implementation defined in Standard SQL.
I find that weird. Doesn't that limit portability a lot? Or at least increas
e test time? What was
the rational behind making it implementation defined? Vendors couldn't agree
because of current
implementation?
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"--CELKO--" <jcelko212@.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1115954756.702609.23790@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> You might also like to know that truncation and rounding at
> implementation defined in Standard SQL.
>
rounding between access 97 and sql 2000.See
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...en-us%3B196652.
--Mary
On Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:28 -0500, "Ben Wallace \(3\)"
<kixman@.excite.com> wrote:
>Can anyone provide any links or information about the differences in
>rounding between access 97 and sql 2000.
>|||You might also like to know that truncation and rounding at
implementation defined in Standard SQL.|||> You might also like to know that truncation and rounding are
> implementation defined in Standard SQL.
I find that weird. Doesn't that limit portability a lot? Or at least increas
e test time? What was
the rational behind making it implementation defined? Vendors couldn't agree
because of current
implementation?
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"--CELKO--" <jcelko212@.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1115954756.702609.23790@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> You might also like to know that truncation and rounding at
> implementation defined in Standard SQL.
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)